A Randomized Crossover Study of Disposable Thermometers for Prevention of <i>Clostridium difficile</i> and Other Nosocomial Infections

John A. Jernigan, Yardena Siegman‐Igra, Richard C. Guerrant, Barry M. Farr

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · 1998 · 77 citations · 13 references

Concepts

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that use of disposable thermometers would result in lower rates of nosocomial Clostridium difficile diarrhea and of total nosocomial infections, compared with electronic thermometers. DESIGN: Prospective randomized crossover trial. SETTING: A 700-bed university hospital providing primary and tertiary care. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to a group of 20 inpatient nursing units. INTERVENTIONS: 20 nursing units were randomized into two groups. One group randomly was assigned exclusive use of single-use disposable thermometers for patient temperature measurement, and the other group was assigned exclusive use of electronic thermometers. After 6 months, the assignments were reversed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of C difficile infections, total nosocomial diarrheal episodes, and total nosocomial infections were prospectively followed in each study unit over 11 months. RESULTS: 26,350 patients were admitted to the study units and hospitalized for 120,529 patient days. There were 947 nosocomial infections (7.86 per 1,000 patient days). Nosocomial C difficile-associated diarrhea defined by positivity to both toxin B (titer > or = 1:10) and toxin A was detected in 32 patients (3.4% of all nosocomial infections). A significantly lower rate of nosocomial C difficile-associated diarrhea was observed with disposable thermometer use (0.16 per 1,000 patient days) compared with electronic thermometer use (0.37 per 1,000 patient days, relative risk [RR] = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 0.21-0.93, P = .026). There was no difference in overall rates of nosocomial infection between the disposable and electronic groups (8.03 and 7.68 infections per 1,000 patient days, respectively; RR, 1.04; CI95, 0.92-1.19; P = .52) or in the overall rate of nosocomial diarrhea (3.34 and 3.40 per 1,000 patient days, respectively; RR, .98; CI95, 0.81-1.19; P = .87). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of nosocomial C difficile diarrhea was reduced significantly by using single-use, disposable thermometers as compared with electronic thermometers, but there was no effect on either the overall rate of nosocomial diarrhea or the rate of total nosocomial infections.

References

13