Journal of Personality Assessment · 2006 · 40 citations · 40 references
Social SciencesBehavioral SciencesPsychologyIndividual DifferencesPersonality PsychologyPsychometricsPersonality AssessmentPersonality TraitsPsychological TestingTest ReliabilityInterrater ReliabilitySystem StabilityTask Engagement MeasurementTask Engagement Over TimeTest-retest ReliabilityTest-retest Reproducibility
The objective of this study was to provide new primary data on Rorschach Comprehensive System stability levels. To achieve this, we tested 75 French nonpatient adults twice on the Rorschach with a 3-month interval between the tests. Interrater reliability was in the excellent range for most of the variables studied. The overall stability level in a selected set of previously studied variables was below expectations (median r = .53). Personality, cognitive or self/relational variables yielded higher test-retest correlations than emotional and coping variables. Moderators of stability could be identified: (a) overall level of Task Engagement (TE) in F, m, FM + m, a, FC, Sum C', Sum V, Sum Shd, Fr + rF, INC + FAB, COP, es, Adj es, EGO, and Blends; (b) variations in TE in F, FM, and p; (c) state distress in Zd, m, FM + m, a, C, CF + C, WSumC, FD, and es; (d) variables derived from the number of responses impacted stability in P, Zf, m, FC, CF + C, Sum C', Sum V, MOR, EA, es, and Blends. These results provide further support for the reliability of several measures. Examiner effects as an influence on productivity and TE were identified as an important area for future research.
40
Jacob Cohen · Psychological Bulletin · 1992 · 42.2K citations
Jacob Cohen · Psychological Bulletin · 1992 · 8.8K citations