State subsidies to political parties: Confronting rhetoric with reality

Jon Pierre, Lars Svåsand, Anders Widfeldt

West European Politics · 2000 · 166 citations · 19 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The debate over subsidising political parties is framed by arguments for and against, alongside an overview of subsidy models and regulatory frameworks. The article investigates the political impact of introducing state subsidies to political parties. Across multiple countries, the study finds that party subsidies have little cross‑national effect, do not explain or respond to membership declines, do not petrify party systems, and do not diminish the importance of other income sources.

Abstract

This article investigates the political impact of the introduction of state subsidies to political parties. The arguments for and against subsidising political parties are outlined. Different models of party subsidies, and their regulatory frameworks, are discussed. We find little evidence of a cross‐national impact of the introduction of party subsidies. The subsidies cannot explain the decline in party membership. Nor is there evidence to suggest that the subsidies were introduced as a response to membership decline. There is no support for the allegation that party subsidies lead to the petrification of party systems. The subsidies have not meant that other income sources have lost their significance for political parties.

References

19