Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization

František Lichtenberk

Language · 1991 · 280 citations · 20 references

Concepts

TL;DR

In Oceanic languages, directional verbs such as “go,” “come,” and “return” undergo grammaticalization, yet their historically related meanings can be synchronically unrelated. The study investigates the semantic aspects of these grammaticalization developments, the motivating factors, and the relationships among the meanings of the etyma. The developments are directly motivated by metaphor and metonymy. The motivations for functional extensions support the view that meaning is essentially subjective and open-ended. The other section notes that the developments stem from human conceptualization of phenomena.

Abstract

In Oceanic languages, elements that function or used to function as directional verbs of motion—'go', 'come', and 'return'—undergo a variety of grammaticalization processes. This study is an investigation of the semantic aspects of those developments, the factors that motivate the functional extensions, and the relations among the meanings/functions of the etyma. It is human conceptualization of phenomena (viz. metaphor and metonymy) that directly motivates the developments. Even though the various meanings/functions of an etymon are all historically related, synchronically there need not be any property exclusively shared by all of them. The nature of the motivations for the functional extensions provides support for the view of meaning as essentially subjective and open-ended.

References

20