PLoS Medicine · 2007 · 142 citations · 14 references
MedicineInfectious DiseasesPharmacologyClinical PharmacologyEvidence-based PracticeGood Clinical PracticeClinical TrialsEvidence-based MedicineEvidence-based Practice ImplementationGuideline DevelopmentGuideline ImplementationSystematic ReviewAvian Influenza ManagementAvian Influenza VirusInfluenza Antiviral TherapyInfluenza TreatmentPre-trial Evidence GatheringRandomized Clinical Trials
Emerging health problems require rapid advice. We describe the development and pilot testing of a systematic, transparent approach used by the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop rapid advice guidelines in response to requests from member states confronted with uncertainty about the pharmacological management of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus infection. We first searched for systematic reviews of randomized trials of treatment and prevention of seasonal influenza and for non-trial evidence on H5N1 infection, including case reports and animal and in vitro studies. A panel of clinical experts, clinicians with experience in treating patients with H5N1, influenza researchers, and methodologists was convened for a two-day meeting. Panel members reviewed the evidence prior to the meeting and agreed on the process. It took one month to put together a team to prepare the evidence profiles (i.e., summaries of the evidence on important clinical and policy questions), and it took the team only five weeks to prepare and revise the evidence profiles and to prepare draft guidelines prior to the panel meeting. A draft manuscript for publication was prepared within 10 days following the panel meeting. Strengths of the process include its transparency and the short amount of time used to prepare these WHO guidelines. The process could be improved by shortening the time required to commission evidence profiles. Further development is needed to facilitate stakeholder involvement, and evaluate and ensure the guideline's usefulness.
14
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
David C. Atkins, Dana Best, Peter A. Briss et al. · BMJ · 2004 · 8.5K citations · Full text
Are Guidelines Following Guidelines?
Terrence Shaneyfelt, Michael F. Mayo‐Smith, Johann Rothwangl · JAMA · 1999 · 845 citations
Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal
Roberto Grilli, Nicola Magrini, A. Penna et al. · The Lancet · 2000 · 678 citations
Holger J. Schünemann, Roman Jaeschke, William F. Bria et al. · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2006 · 580 citations