The Astrophysical Journal · 2014 · 172 citations · 151 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsPlanetary AstronomyPlanetary ScienceDwarf PlanetsExoplanet Host StarsMassive StarsStellar EvolutionStellar KinematicsYoung Stellar ObjectsBinary Star ObservationsDoppler ImagingDoppler MeasurementsHigh-contrast ImagingM Dwarf StarsM-dwarf Host StarsPlanet Occurrence RatesRadial Velocity Measurements
Doppler-based planet surveys have discovered numerous giant planets but are incomplete beyond several AU. At larger star–planet separations, direct planet detection through high-contrast imaging has proven successful, but this technique is sensitive only to young planets and characterization relies upon theoretical evolution models. Here we demonstrate that radial velocity measurements and high-contrast imaging can be combined to overcome these issues. The presence of widely separated companions can be deduced by identifying an acceleration (long-term trend) in the radial velocity of a star. By obtaining high spatial resolution follow-up imaging observations, we rule out scenarios in which such accelerations are caused by stellar binary companions with high statistical confidence. We report results from an analysis of Doppler measurements of a sample of 111 M-dwarf stars with a median of 29 radial velocity observations over a median time baseline of 11.8 yr. By targeting stars that exhibit a radial velocity acceleration ("trend") with adaptive optics imaging, we determine that 6.5% ± 3.0% of M-dwarf stars host one or more massive companions with 1 < m/M_J < 13 and 0 < a < 20 AU. These results are lower than analyses of the planet occurrence rate around higher-mass stars. We find the giant planet occurrence rate is described by a double power law in stellar mass M and metallicity F ≡ [Fe/H] such that f(M, F) = 0.039^+0.056)_(-0.028)M^(0.8)^(+1.1)_(-0.9) 10^(3.8±1.2). Our results are consistent with gravitational microlensing measurements of the planet occurrence rate; this study represents the first model-independent comparison with microlensing observations.
151
Robert E. Kass, Adrian E. Raftery · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1995 · 12.3K citations
Natural Sciences, Behavioral Sciences, Bayesian Biostatistics +11
The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)
Michael F. Skrutskie, R. M. Cutri, R. Stiening et al. · The Astronomical Journal · 2006 · 12.2K citations · Full text
<tt>emcee</tt>: The MCMC Hammer
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · 2013 · 11.9K citations · Full text
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +14
Kepler Planet-Detection Mission: Introduction and First Results
W. J. Borucki, David Koch, Gibor Basri et al. · Science · 2010 · 4.1K citations
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +11