Comparison of Two Integrated Methods for the Collection and Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ground Water

Abstract

Abstract The principal difficulties with determinations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ground water are the reliability of sampling procedures and analytical methods. Two integrated methods have been developed for routine sampling, processing, and analysis of VOCs in ground water. These methods involve in situ collection of ground water using a modified syringe sampler from PVC piezometers or using dedicated glass syringes from stainless steel multilevel bores. The samples are processed in the syringe using purge and trap or microsolvent extraction and analyzed by GC/MSD. The modified purge‐and‐trap method is time‐consuming and limited to volatile organic compounds. However, it is extremely sensitive and flexible: the volume of sample used can be varied by the use of different‐size glass syringes (sample volumes from 1 to 100 mL). In cases where extremely low sensitivity (<10 mg 1 −1 ) is not critical, the microextraction technique is a more cost‐effective method, allowing twice as many samples to be analyzed in the same time as the purge‐and‐trap method. It enables less volatile compounds such as polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, phenol, and cresols to be analyzed in the same GC run. Also, the microextraction method can be used in the field to avoid delays associated with transportation of ground water samples to the laboratory.