British journal of surgery · 1997 · 37 citations · 37 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryGastrointestinal OncologyGeneral SurgerySurgical OncologyClinical AuditColorectal CancerColorectal SurgeryGastrointestinal Cancer SurgerySurgical ComplicationsSurgical SafetySurgical Audit
BACKGROUND: Some authorities recommend that colorectal cancer should be treated in specialist units but evidence that non-specialist units demonstrate comparatively poor results may be lacking. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1991, 267 patients were operated on by four general surgeons, none of whom was a specialist in colorectal surgery. Procedure-related complications, postoperative mortality and disease-related survival rates were analysed. RESULTS: There were four cases of intraperitoneal sepsis (1 per cent) and five of 189 patients (3 per cent) had clinical anastomotic dehiscence; there was no case of wound dehiscence. The postoperative mortality rate after elective and emergency surgery was 2 and 13 per cent respectively. The 5-year disease-related survival rate for curative and palliative surgery was 67 and 9 per cent respectively. There were no significant differences between the surgeons. CONCLUSION: Disease-related variables such as early-stage disease and fewer patients presenting as emergencies may have a greater favourable influence on ultimate survival than surgeon-related variables.
37
RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL AFTER TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCER
Richard J. Heald, R. D. H. Ryall · The Lancet · 1986 · 2.7K citations
The classification of cancer of the rectum
Cuthbert Dukes · The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology · 1932 · 1.5K citations
RANDOMISED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF FAECAL OCCULT BLOOD SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER
J D Hardcastle, J Chamberlain, J P Sheffield et al. · The Lancet · 1989 · 534 citations