American Journal of Occupational Therapy · 2011 · 47 citations · 32 references
EducationEducational MeasurementRehabilitation MedicinePhysical DisabilitiesPsychometricsRehabilitationDisability AssessmentDisability EvaluationFactor AnalysisHand Function AssessmentPsychological TestingUpper Extremity Function AssessmentAndrich Rating Scale ModelComparative Fit IndexFit Index EvaluationHand Function QuestionnairesHealth-related Disability MeasurementRasch Rating Scale ModelTucker-lewis IndexUpper Extremity Impairment Assessment
OBJECTIVE: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a global scale evaluating the impact of upper-extremity disorders. We sought to validate or challenge the unidimensional factor structure of the DASH. METHOD: Secondary analysis was performed on data collected from outpatient clinics. Factor analysis was performed in two steps, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). To provide further support for unidimensionality, fit statistics were calculated using the Andrich Rasch rating-scale model. RESULTS: EFA revealed three potential factors (eigenvalues = 18.40, 1.56, and 1.54). CFA was performed fitting a three-factor model. Tucker-Lewis Index (.99) and standardized root mean square residual (.05) values indicated good fit. Comparative fit index (.89) and root mean square error of approximation (.13) did not. When divided into three constructs, only one item misfit. CONCLUSION: More research is needed to determine situations in which division of the DASH may enhance interpretability.
32
Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
Choice Reviews Online · 2007 · 15.8K citations
Social Sciences, Educational Measurement, Method Validation +12
A Rating Formulation for Ordered Response Categories
David Andrich · Psychometrika · 1978 · 3K citations