Journal of Evolutionary Biology · 1999 · 558 citations · 109 references
Life SciencesBiologyEvolutionary BiologyEvolutionary EcologyEvolutionary TheoryReproductive BiologyAsexual ReproductionEvolutionMeiotic RecombinationNatural SelectionReproductive EvolutionSex DeterminationMutation-selection ModelsPluralist PhilosophyRecombination EffectsSexual Reproduction EvolutionSexual Selection Theory
Sexual reproduction and genetic recombination are widespread, yet explaining their evolutionary advantage remains a major challenge. The authors aim to demonstrate that considering multiple mechanisms—environmental and mutational—and their interactions can provide advantages. They adopt a pluralist approach that integrates environmental and mutation‑based models to explore their combined effects.
Abstract One of the greatest challenges for evolutionary biology is explaining the widespread occurrence of sexual reproduction and the associated process of genetic recombination. A large number of theories have been developed that provide a sufficient short-term advantage for sex to offset its two-fold cost. These theories can be broadly classified into environmental (or ecological) and mutation-based models. Traditionally, the different theories have been viewed as competing, and empirical work has attempted to distinguish between them. Here we highlight the advantages that may be gained from considering that multiple mechanisms (environmental and mutational) may be at work, and that interactions between the theories may be very important.
109
Eric L. Charnov · PubMed · 1982 · 2.9K citations
John R. Platt · Science · 1964 · 2.9K citations
George C. Williams · PubMed · 1975 · 2.1K citations
Sex versus Non-Sex versus Parasite
W D Hamilton · Oikos · 1980 · 1.4K citations