Denial and Social Desirability in Clinical Evaluations of Alleged Sex Offenders

Abstract

Clinicians are increasingly being requested to evaluate alleged sex offenders. Denial of sex offenses and minimization of psychopathology is common in such patients. We studied the relationship between denial of deviant sexual behavior and minimization/exaggeration of problems (i.e., response bias) during clinical evaluations in 59 alleged sex offenders. The data indicated that patients who denied allegations of deviant sexual behavior showed significantly more minimization of problems than did admitters (p < .001), and patients who admitted allegations showed more exaggeration of problems than did deniers (p < .05). Response bias was significantly associated with a number of personality characteristics. In particular, alleged offenders who denied deviant sexual behavior were more likely to be defensive about undesirable personality characteristics and to minimize problems than were those who admitted to deviant sexual behavior. When defensive, alleged sex offenders were likely to minimize anxiety and personality disorders. The data support the forensic utility of psychological testing in the assessment of alleged sex offenders.