The electronic, personalizable Rosetta system for dementia care: exploring the user-friendliness, usefulness and impact

Bart Hattink, Franka Meiland, Tessa Overmars‐Marx, Moniek de Boer, Peter Ebben, M. van Blanken, Sofie Verhaeghe, Ir. I. N. W. Stalpers-Croeze, Andreas Jedlitschka, S. E. Flick,

Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · 2014 · 76 citations · 32 references

Abstract

All participants found Rosetta a very useful development for future care, and would consider using it. Since Rosetta was still in development during evaluation, a discrepancy between expectations and actual functioning of Rosetta existed, which may explain the lack of findings on the impact of the system and the low appreciation of user-friendliness. Implications for Rehabilitation People with dementia and carers find assistive technology (AT) a useful future development and they are willing to use it in the future. People with dementia and carers have little privacy issues with AT. If they have concerns, they are willing to accept the trade-off of reduced privacy in exchange for the ability to live in their own homes for longer. Given that a system works flawlessly, informal carers indicate that integrated AT can reduce their burden and stress. This can in turn help informal carers to provide better care for a longer period of time.

References

32