Application of the Kurtosis Statistic to the Evaluation of the Risk of Hearing Loss in Workers Exposed to High-Level Complex Noise

Abstract

In Brief Objective: Develop dose-response relations for two groups of industrial workers exposed to Gaussian or non-Gaussian (complex) types of continuous noises and to investigate what role, if any, the kurtosis statistic can play in the evaluation of industrial noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). Design: Audiometric and noise exposure data were acquired on a population (N = 195) of screened workers from a textile manufacturing plant and a metal fabrication facility located in Henan province of China. Thirty-two of the subjects were exposed to non-Gaussian (non-G) noise and 163 were exposed to a Gaussian (G) continuous noise. Each subject was given a general physical and an otologic examination. Hearing threshold levels (0.5–8.0 kHz) were age adjusted (ISO-1999) and the prevalence of NIHL at 3, 4, or 6 kHz was determined. The kurtosis metric, which is sensitive to the peak and temporal characteristics of a noise, was introduced into the calculation of the cumulative noise exposure metric. Using the prevalence of hearing loss and the cumulative noise exposure metric, a dose-response relation for the G and non-G noise-exposed groups was constructed. Results: An analysis of the noise environments in the two plants showed that the noise exposures in the textile plant were of a Gaussian type with an Leq(A)8hr that varied from 96 to 105 dB whereas the exposures in the metal fabrication facility with an Leq(A)8hr = 95 dB were of a non-G type containing high levels (up to 125 dB peak SPL) of impact noise. The kurtosis statistic was used to quantify the deviation of the non-G noise environment from the Gaussian. The dose-response relation for the non-G noise-exposed subjects showed a higher prevalence of hearing loss for a comparable cumulative noise exposure than did the G noise-exposed subjects. By introducing the kurtosis variable into the temporal component of the cumulative noise exposure calculation, the two dose-response curves could be made to overlap, essentially yielding an equivalent noise-induced effect for the two study groups. Conclusions: For the same exposure level, the prevalence of NIHL is greater in workers exposed to non-G noise environments than for workers exposed to G noise. The kurtosis metric may be a reasonable candidate for use in modifying exposure level calculations that are used to estimate the risk of NIHL from any type of noise exposure environment. However, studies involving a large number of workers with well-documented exposures are needed before a relation between a metric such as the kurtosis and the risk of hearing loss can be refined. Audiometric and noise exposure data were acquired on a population (N = 195) of industrial workers exposed to either a Gaussian noise with Leq(A)8h that varied from 96 to 105 dB or to a nonGaussian, complex noise with Leq(A)8h = 95 dB. The kurtosis statistic quantified the deviation of the complex noise from the Gaussian. The cumulative noise exposure (CNE) for each group was computed along with the prevalence of hearing loss. The dose response relation for the complex noise exposed subjects showed a higher prevalence of hearing loss for a comparable CNE than did Gaussian noise-exposed subjects. When the kurtosis variable was used to modify the CNE, the two dose response curves were similar, yielding an equivalent noise-induced effect for the two groups.