Publication | Closed Access
Deliberative Multicriteria Evaluation
196
Citations
11
References
2006
Year
EngineeringEnvironmental Impact AssessmentDecision AnalysisEnvironmental PlanningStakeholder AnalysisMultiple-criteria Decision AnalysisParticipatory Decision-makingEnvironmental PolicyProgram EvaluationDeliberative Multicriteria EvaluationInformation RetrievalManagementMulti-criteria Decision MakingMulticriteria EvaluationEnvironmental ManagementStakeholder JuryMining ManagementDecision TheoryEnvironmental ConsiderationsPublic PolicyDecision-makingAutomated ReasoningEvaluation MeasureNatural Resource ManagementDecision ScienceEvaluation TechniqueLinguisticsDecision Technology
Multicriteria evaluation is a proven method for structuring complex environmental decisions, and formal deliberative processes have successfully facilitated understanding and consensus among multiple decisionmakers. The study aims to combine multicriteria evaluation with a citizens' jury to help natural resource managers choose suitable recreation and tourism options for the upper Goulburn–Broken Catchment. The method integrates MCE with a citizens' jury, combining structured evaluation with stakeholder deliberation. The process revealed critical aspects requiring deeper assessment, offered improvement suggestions, and was regarded by decisionmakers as a helpful, useful procedure that enhanced their understanding of the complex decision problem.
Multicriteria evaluation (MCE) is a well-tried and effective procedure for structuring and aiding complex decisionmaking processes, especially those involving environmental considerations. Formal deliberative processes have also been successful in aiding understanding and meeting consensus in complex and difficult decision problems which involve more than one decisionmaker. Here, both approaches are combined in a new technique called ‘deliberative multicriteria evaluation’ to assist a group of natural resource managers to decide on a suitable option for recreation and tourism activities in the upper Goulburn–Broken Catchment of Victoria, Australia. This approach is an attempt to combine the advantages of MCE, providing structure and integration in complex decision problems, with the advantages of deliberation and stakeholder interaction provided by a ‘citizens' jury’. An important outcome of the process was the discovery of some crucial aspects of the decision problem that required deeper understanding and assessment if that preferred strategy were to have the desired results. Some suggestions for improving the process are provided but, in general, the stakeholder jury was regarded as a helpful and useful procedure by the decisionmakers and one which aided them in their understanding of the issues of a complex decisionmaking problem.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1