Management Science · 1976 · 172 citations · 17 references
BusinessEconomicsFinanceFinancial EconomicsInvestment ManagementPortfolio ManagementInvestment TheoryPortfolio TheoryRisk AversionRisk PreferencesRisk-return AnalysisStochastic DominanceExpected Utility MaximizationExpected Utility TheoryFirst-degree Stochastic DominanceFirst-order Stochastic DominanceIncreasing Absolute Risk AversionOptimal Portfolio ChoicePortfolio Choice TheoryPortfolio Choice Under Risk
This paper examines changes in the optimal proportions of investment capital placed in a safe asset and in a risky asset by an expected utility maximizing risk averse investor. If the return for the safe asset increases and the risky asset distribution remains fixed, the optimal proportion invested in the safe asset will increase provided that the investor's absolute risk aversion is nondecreasing or his proportional risk aversion never exceeds unity. Otherwise, it can be optimal to decrease holdings in the safe asset when its return increases. If the return for the safe asset remains fixed and the risky distribution improves by a first degree stochastic dominance change, the optimal proportion invested in the risky asset will increase (or not decrease) provided that proportional risk aversion never exceeds one plus the product of the gross return for the safe asset times absolute risk aversion. Otherwise, it may be optimal to decrease holdings in the risky asset when its distribution improves in the indicated manner.
17
Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large
John W. Pratt · Econometrica · 1976 · 4.7K citations
Increasing risk: I. A definition
Michael Rothschild, Joseph E. Stiglitz · Journal of Economic Theory · 1970 · 3.9K citations
Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing.
S. A. Ozga, Kenneth J. Arrow · Economica · 1966 · 1.9K citations
Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects
Josef Hadar, William R. Russell · American Economic Review · 1969 · 1.7K citations