MATING SYSTEM AND SEXCUL DIMORPHISM IN LARGE TERRESTRIAL, MAMMALIAN HERBIVORES

Abstract

Summary Sexual dimorphism in mammals is not entirely satisfactorily explained by the models that are advanced to account for it among birds. This may be because species‐specific styles of being dimorphic, and of attaining mature dimorphic state, are not clearly recognized. Mature dimorphism is a syndrome involving body size, appearance and weaponry; each facet and the whole syndrome may have functions in both fighting and signalling. The mature dimorphic stage has to be reached by growth and change from juvenile and sub‐adult states. The occurrence of the separate facets of the dimorphic syndrome are reviewed in species of Bovidae, Cervidae and Macropodidae, large, diverse families of eutherian (the first two) and metatherian mammals, which have broadly similar ecological adaptations. In each family the smallest species tend to be homomorphic, with small, inconspicuous weapons. Greatest dimorphism in size is found in medium‐sized bovids and cervids, and the larger macropodids (in which no species exceeds 100 kg male weight); the range of species showing greatest dimorphism in size also shows the most exaggerated weapons. Mature dimorphism is reached by different patterns of growth, which may be determinate and similar in the sexes (leading to homomorphism), determinate but differing between the sexes, or indeterminate and differing, both of which lead to heteromorphism. The syndromes of dimorphism and patterns of growth are associated and a classification of styles of dimorphism is presented. The adaptiveness of the styles is suggested in terms of what is known of the socio‐ecology, in particular the male reproductive strategies, of the species. The various styles of heteromorphy appear to be associated with males' way of achieving polygyny: such as by non‐resource‐based territoriality, by dominance‐determined access to oestrous females, or by wandering and formation of a consortship with pro‐oestrous females. The relevance of the species' ecology of use of resources to these styles of dimorphism and mate‐acquisition is briefly discussed.