IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2012 · 119 citations · 61 references
ComputingData ScienceData MiningMachine LearningStatistical LearningBias-variance TradeoffBootstrap MethodsClassificationKernel MethodsOptimization For Machine LearningSupport Vector MachinesCross-validationEstimation ErrorProblem ReformulationStandard Error EstimationStructural Risk MinimizationSupport Vector Machine ClassificationSvms
In-sample approaches to model selection and error estimation of support vector machines (SVMs) are not as widespread as out-of-sample methods, where part of the data is removed from the training set for validation and testing purposes, mainly because their practical application is not straightforward and the latter provide, in many cases, satisfactory results. In this paper, we survey some recent and not-so-recent results of the data-dependent structural risk minimization framework and propose a proper reformulation of the SVM learning algorithm, so that the in-sample approach can be effectively applied. The experiments, performed both on simulated and real-world datasets, show that our in-sample approach can be favorably compared to out-of-sample methods, especially in cases where the latter ones provide questionable results. In particular, when the number of samples is small compared to their dimensionality, like in classification of microarray data, our proposal can outperform conventional out-of-sample approaches such as the cross validation, the leave-one-out, or the Bootstrap methods.
61
Corinna Cortes, Vladimir Vapnik · Machine Learning · 1995 · 40.5K citations · Full text
Corinna Cortes, Vladimir Vapnik · Machine Learning · 1995 · 33K citations · Full text
Yuhai Wu, Vladimir Vapnik · Technometrics · 1999 · 27K citations
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Journal of Electronic Imaging · 2007 · 22.1K citations
Todd R. Golub, Donna K. Slonim, Pablo Tamayo et al. · Science · 1999 · 11.6K citations