SIAM Journal on Optimization · 2012 · 19 citations · 21 references
Mathematical ProgrammingBranch-and-bound AlgorithmEngineeringComputational ComplexityNew Linearization SchemeDiscrete OptimizationOperations ResearchDiscrete MathematicsCombinatorial OptimizationApproximation TheoryInteger OptimizationExact ApproachComputer EngineeringComputer ScienceUpper BoundInteger ProgrammingQuadratic ProgrammingOptimization ProblemLinear ProgrammingKnapsack ProblemBranch And BoundTight Upper Bound
This paper presents an exact solution method based on a new linearization scheme for the 0-1 quadratic knapsack problem, which consists of maximizing a quadratic pseudo-Boolean function with nonnegative coefficients subject to a linear capacity constraint. Contrasting with traditional linearization schemes, our approach adds only one extra variable. The suggested linearization framework provides a tight upper bound, which is used in a branch-and-bound scheme. This upper bound is numerically compared with that of [A. Billionnet, A. Faye, and E. Soutif, European J. Oper. Res., 112 (1999), pp. 664--672], and our branch-and-bound scheme with the exact algorithm of [W. D. Pisinger, A. B. Rasmussen, and R. Sandvik, INFORMS J. Comput., 19 (2007), pp. 280--290]. The experiments show that our upper bound is quite competitive (less than $1\%$ from the optimum). In addition, the proposed branch-and-bound clearly outperforms the algorithm developed by Pisinger et al. for low density instances ($25\%$) for all instances up to $400$ variables.
21
Minimum cuts and related problems
Jean‐Claude Picard, H. Donald Ratliff · Networks · 1975 · 243 citations
Mathematical Programming, Directed Graph, Pseudosymmetric Networks +19
The quadratic knapsack problem—a survey
David Pisinger · Discrete Applied Mathematics · 2006 · 212 citations
Mathematical Programming, Engineering, Integer Optimization +10