Choice Reviews Online · 1989 · 660 citations · 0 references
HumanitiesClassicsPolitical ScienceGreek HistoryPolitical SociologyRhetoricAncient GreeceAncient Greek RhetoricAthenian DemocracyClassical GreecePolitical ElitesPolitical IdeologyAncient Greek PoliticsDemocratic IdeologyElite Ideology
The book investigates why Athenian democracy endured, noting that citizen jurymen and Assemblymen held significant powers that required elite politicians to communicate in ways accessible to ordinary citizens. The study aims to uncover how elite speakers used rhetoric to bridge the gap between elite and nonelite citizens in Athenian democracy. Ober surveys the Athenian constitution and analyzes political and legal rhetoric to reveal the social strategies elite speakers employed. He shows that public speech vocabulary created a democratic discourse reconciling political equality ideals with social inequality, and that his reevaluation of leadership restores essential elements of Athens’ social and ideological context.
This book asks an important question often ignored by ancient historians and political scientists alike: Why did Athenian democracy work as well and for as long as it did? Josiah Ober seeks the answer by analyzing the sociology of Athenian politics and the nature of communication between elite and nonelite citizens. After a preliminary survey of the development of the Athenian constitution, he focuses on the role of political and legal rhetoric. As jurymen and Assemblymen, the citizen masses of Athens retained important powers, and elite Athenian politicians and litigants needed to address these large bodies of ordinary citizens in terms understandable and acceptable to the audience. This book probes the social strategies behind the rhetorical tactics employed by elite speakers.A close reading of the speeches exposes both egalitarian and elitist elements in Athenian popular ideology. Ober demonstrates that the vocabulary of public speech constituted a democratic discourse that allowed the Athenians to resolve contradictions between the ideal of political equality and the reality of social inequality. His radical reevaluation of leadership and political power in classical Athens restores key elements of the social and ideological context of the first western democracy.