Australian Journal of Soil Research · 1994 · 24 citations · 0 references
AgricultureEarth SciencesSoil SciencesSoil BiogeochemistrySoil ChemistrySoil ScienceSoil Chemical PropertiesSoil Organic Matter ChemistrySoil PhSulfur ChemistrySulfur Compound AnalysisSulfur OxidesField Soil SamplingResidual SulfurSoil Sulfur CyclingSoil Sulfur TestingSoil Type DependenceSulfate ChemistrySulfur Adsorption In SoilsSulfur Compound Extraction
Three forms of sulfur (S) were determined in extracts from field-moist, air-dried and conditioned (i.e. maintained at 20°C and 75% field moisture capacity for 2 weeks) soils by using four extractants-water, CaCl2, KH2PO4 and Ca(H2PO4)2. The amounts and proportions of inorganic sulfate (SO2-4-S), organic HI-reducible S (HI-S) and carbon bonded S (C-S) in extracts varied with soil type, method of sample preparation and the extractant used. Substantially less S overall was extracted from field-moist soil compared with air-dried and conditioned soils. For soils with pH values close to or above 6, water and phosphate extractants removed similar amounts of SO2-4-S. However, phosphate solutions removed greater amounts of SO2-4-S than water from soils with relatively low pH or with a large capacity for sulfate adsorption. The CaCl2 solution extracted the smallest amounts of sulfate from the soils studied. There was no consistent ratio between extractable sulfate-S and extractable organic S. Extracts from air-dried soil contained the greatest amounts and proportions of organic S, particularly in phosphate extracts. The conditioning of soils decreased the extractable organic S and increased the sulfate-S, indicating that extractable organic S is readily mineralizable. The relative proportions of extractable organic S present as HI-S and C-S varied considerably. Comparison of the conditioned and air-dried soils indicated there was no difference between the two forms of organic S in their ease of mineralization.