Cranioplasty of Large Cranial Defect at an Early Stage After Decompressive Craniectomy Performed for Severe Head Trauma

Liang Wen, Xiaofeng Yang, Weiguo Liu, Gang Shen, Zheng Xuesheng, Fei Cao, Li Gu

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · 2007 · 180 citations · 20 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Large cranial defects after decompressive craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension often lead to early complications that impede rehabilitation, and cranioplasty is typically performed three months post‑surgery. The study aims to prospectively and retrospectively compare outcomes to confirm the benefits of early cranioplasty in patients with large cranial defects after decompressive craniectomy. The authors retrospectively reviewed 23 patients who received early cranioplasty 5–8 weeks after decompressive craniectomy over four years, evaluating patient selection, postoperative complications, and prognosis. Early cranioplasty led to rapid recovery of consciousness and improved neurological function, with 74 % of patients becoming independent at 18 months, no deaths or infections, and most complications resolving; the authors conclude the procedure is safe and beneficial for patients with large cranial defects.

Abstract

Large cranial defects resulting from decompressive craniectomy performed for refractory intracranial hypertension after head trauma is one of the indications for cranioplasty, and this procedure is commonly performed 3 months after craniectomy. However, the large cranial defect would lead to the kinds of complications early during the phase of these patients' recovery, which would go against rehabilitation. This study retrospectively reviewed 23 patients undergoing early cranioplasty (5-8 weeks after craniectomy) in the last 4 years with a detailed choice of patients, outcome of complications after head trauma and large craniectomy, as well as assessment of prognosis. The early outcome (1 month later) revealed most of the patients who had conscious disturbance before the cranioplasty recovered their consciousness and presented an improved neurologic function. The long-dated prognosis (18 months later) revealed that 17 patients were good (independent patients) in this series (74%), whereas four patients survived with a severe disability (17%) and two remained in a vegetative state (9%). No dead patients or intracranial infection after the procedure were found in this study. Most patients' complications were relieved after the cranioplasty with improvements of symptoms or image of computed tomography scan. In conclusion, we consider that with the appropriate choice of patients and materials, early cranioplasty for large cranial defects after decompressive craniectomy would be safe and helpful for the improvement of patients' neurologic function and prognosis. To our knowledge, this series may be the first detailed report in English about early cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. We are going to perform prospective and retrospective contrastive studies to further confirm the effects of this procedure on the patients with large cranial defects after decompressive craniectomy.

References

20