Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2008 · 160 citations · 45 references
Breeding BehaviorKin RecognitionFitnessSpatial FidelityIndividual DifferencesSexual SelectionReproductive BiologyReproduction ResponseSocial SciencesPublic HealthReproductive SuccessArginine VasopressinBehavioral NeuroscienceSexual FidelityMale Prairie VolesSex DifferencePopulation GeneticsSexual BehaviorBiologyEvolutionary BiologyAnimal BehaviorNeural V1ar
Although prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are socially monogamous, males vary in both sexual and spatial fidelity. Most males form pairbonds, cohabit with one female, and defend territories. Wandering males, in contrast, have expansive home ranges that overlap many males and females. In the laboratory, pairing is regulated by arginine vasopressin and its predominant CNS receptor, vasopressin 1a receptor (V1aR). We investigated individual differences in forebrain V1aR expression of male prairie voles in mixed-sex seminatural enclosures. Individual differences in V1aR were compared with space use measured by radio telemetry and paternity determined with microsatellite markers. Animals engaging in extra-pair fertilizations (EPFs) as either wanderers or paired residents overlapped significantly more in same- and opposite-sex home ranges. Surprisingly, neither social fidelity measured by space use nor sexual fidelity measured by paternity was associated with V1aR expression in the ventral pallidum (VPall) or lateral septum, areas causally related to pairbond formation. In contrast, V1aR expression in the posterior cingulate/retrosplenial cortex (PCing) and laterodorsal thalamus (LDThal), areas implicated in spatial memory, strongly covaried with space use and paternity. Animals engaging in EPFs either as wanderers or paired residents exhibited low levels of LDThal and PCing V1aR expression. Individual differences in brain and behavior parallel differences between prairie voles and promiscuous congeners. The concordance among space use, paternity, and V1aR in spatial circuits suggests a common link between the mechanisms of spatial behaviors and success at EPF. The combined data demonstrate how organismal biology can inform our understanding of individual and species differences in behavioral mechanisms.
45
The hippocampus as a cognitive map
R.E. Passingham · Neuroscience · 1979 · 5.2K citations
Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data.
S. T. Buckland, Gary C. White, Robert A. Garrott · Biometrics · 1991 · 2.7K citations
A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles
James Winslow, Nick Hastings, C. Sue Carter et al. · Nature · 1993 · 942 citations
A Single Amino Acid Mutation Contributes to Adaptive Beach Mouse Color Pattern
Hopi E. Hoekstra, Rachel J. Hirschmann, Richard A. Bundey et al. · Science · 2006 · 717 citations · Full text
Sites of Neocortical Reorganization Critical for Remote Spatial Memory
Thibault Maviel, Thomas Durkin, Frédérique Menzaghi et al. · Science · 2004 · 654 citations