Postcolonial Studies · 2009 · 35 citations · 0 references
HumanitiesBotanyPlant SciencesLatin American HistoryPaintingVisual CultureBotanical IllustrationIndigenous ArtIndigenous Visual CulturePlant IconographyVisual ArtsBotanical HistoryBotanical IconographyBotanical ImageryColonial Visual CultureHistory Of Natural HistoryIndigenous ImageryIndigenous Visual SovereigntySelective Focus
Botanical illustrations in Spain’s “visible empire” disciplined observers, facilitated natural history research, supported patronage networks, and served as a conceptual tool. The essay examines how botany and visual culture intersected in the Hispanic Enlightenment, linking natural history to imperial economic goals and to the cultural development of science. The study analyzes thousands of botanical paintings created from 1783 to 1816 in New Granada under José Celestino Mutis’s direction. The analysis shows that imperial visual focus sharpened certain objects while selectively obscuring their origins, stripping indigenous context and turning local plants into global commodities.
This essay discusses the connections between botany and visual culture in the Hispanic enlightenment, addressing the importance of natural history to the economic aims of imperialism as well as the cultural and intellectual importance of imperialism to the development of natural history. It focuses on the thousands of botanical paintings produced between 1783 and 1816 by a large team working in New Granada (now Colombia) under the direction of the Spanish naturalist José Celestino Mutis. Images played multiple roles within Spain's ‘visible empire.’ Botanical illustrations helped to discipline the eyes of both botanists and artists; they served as entry point, instrument, and result of natural historical investigation; they were essential within a culture of gift-exchange and patronage; and they provided a tool with which to think. However, if an imperial eye brought certain objects into sharp focus, it did so by a process of selective blindness. Images preserved the impermanent and transported the distant, but they did so by excising precisely what made the objects of illustration desirable: their place of origin. The indigenous—people, plants, soil, knowledge—was removed as local plants yielded global knowledge and became global commodities.