International Journal of Geomechanics · 2011 · 74 citations · 42 references
EngineeringCivil EngineeringEarthquake EngineeringGeotechnical EngineeringSeismic DesignEarthquake Response Of StructuresFoundation SystemsGeotechnical DesignGeotechnical Earthquake EngineeringNonlinear Structural AnalysisStructural SimulationFluid-solid CouplingGeotechnical ModelingIncremental PlasticityNonlinear PlasticityNumerical ModelingNumerical ModellingSeismic ResponseSeismic Structural Simulation
Calibration of centrifuge and shake‑table data, coupled solid–fluid and nonlinear incremental‑plasticity formulations, and high‑performance parallel computing are expanding the feasibility of large‑scale numerical simulations for more accurate geotechnical earthquake engineering analysis and design. This paper presents three‑dimensional simulations of a shallow‑foundation liquefaction countermeasure, a pile‑supported wharf, and a full bridge‑ground system, and discusses tools that enable routine use of such 3D environments. The simulations employ 3D representative models, and graphical user interfaces and visualization techniques are highlighted as critical for practical adoption.
Calibration, on the basis of data from centrifuge and shake table experiments, continues to promote the development of more accurate computational models. Capabilities such as coupled solid–fluid formulations and nonlinear incremental-plasticity approaches allow for more realistic representations of the involved static and dynamic/seismic responses. In addition, contemporary high-performance parallel computing environments are permitting new insights, gained from analyses of entire ground-foundation-structural systems. On this basis, the horizon is expanding for large-scale numerical simulations to further contribute toward the evolution of more accurate analysis and design strategies. The studies presented in this paper address this issue through recently conducted three-dimensional (3D) representative research efforts that simulate the seismic response of (1) a shallow-foundation liquefaction countermeasure, (2) a pile-supported wharf, and (3) a full bridge-ground system. A discussion of enabling tools for routine usage of such 3D simulation environments is also presented, as an important element in support of wider adoption and practical applications. In this regard, graphical user interfaces and visualization approaches can play a critical role.
42