Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2011 · 488 citations · 28 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesBehavioral EpidemiologyEpidemiologyInfectious Disease EpidemiologyDisease ControlDisease EpidemiologyInfectious Disease DynamicsAdaptive Behavior In EpidemicsDirect Person-to-person TransmissionDisease RiskHuman Disease ModelsInfectious Disease EconomicsInfectious Disease ModelsSocial Distancing BehaviorSocial Distancing Policy
Infectious disease science is entering a new stage where public policy increasingly seeks to motivate people to alter contact behavior, yet the cost–benefit trade‑offs that shape such behavior are often only implicitly modeled, making it hard to parse adaptive behavior’s impact on epidemic dynamics. The authors employ an epidemiological–economic model to explicitly model the trade‑offs that drive person‑to‑person contact decisions. The model couples disease dynamics with economic decision theory to capture how individuals balance contact benefits against disease risk. Including adaptive human behavior markedly alters epidemic predictions, affecting parameter estimation, interpretation, and social distancing policy design, and necessitates a shift in how epidemiological processes and parameters are conceptualized.
The science and management of infectious disease are entering a new stage. Increasingly public policy to manage epidemics focuses on motivating people, through social distancing policies, to alter their behavior to reduce contacts and reduce public disease risk. Person-to-person contacts drive human disease dynamics. People value such contacts and are willing to accept some disease risk to gain contact-related benefits. The cost–benefit trade-offs that shape contact behavior, and hence the course of epidemics, are often only implicitly incorporated in epidemiological models. This approach creates difficulty in parsing out the effects of adaptive behavior. We use an epidemiological–economic model of disease dynamics to explicitly model the trade-offs that drive person-to-person contact decisions. Results indicate that including adaptive human behavior significantly changes the predicted course of epidemics and that this inclusion has implications for parameter estimation and interpretation and for the development of social distancing policies. Acknowledging adaptive behavior requires a shift in thinking about epidemiological processes and parameters.
28
Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data
Jeremy Ginsberg, Matthew H. Mohebbi, Rajan Patel et al. · Nature · 2008 · 4.4K citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Health Informatics, Infectious Diseases +14
Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I
Roy M. Anderson, Robert M. May · Nature · 1979 · 3.2K citations
Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia
Neil M. Ferguson, Derek A. T. Cummings, Simon Cauchemez et al. · Nature · 2005 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Infectious Disease Control, Infectious Diseases +14