The Journal of Urology · 2002 · 520 citations · 23 references
MedicineSurgeryUrologyLaparoscopic UrologySurgical OncologyUrologic SurgeryKidney CancerKidney SurgeryLaparoscopic NephrectomyPartial NephrectomyRenal NeoplasmsRenal SurgeryKidney Cancer SurgeryKidney Tumor SurgeryMinimally Invasive Nephron-sparing SurgeryOpen NephrectomyRenal Tumor SurgerySurgical Nephrectomy
PURPOSE: We describe our technique of and single institutional experience with purely laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor, wherein the focus is to duplicate established open techniques of oncologic nephron sparing surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since August 1999 laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor has been performed in 50 patients. Of the patients 24 (48%) had either a compromised contralateral kidney (20) or a solitary kidney (4). Mean tumor size was 3.0 cm. (range 1.4 to 7). In 9 patients (18%) the inner margin of the tumor was in close proximity to the pelvicaliceal system. Our current laparoscopic technique involves preoperative ureteral catheterization, laparoscopic renal ultrasonography, transient atraumatic clamping of the renal artery and vein, tumor excision with an approximate 0.5 cm. margin using cold endoshears and/or J-hook electrocautery, pelvicaliceal suture repair (if necessary) and suture repair of the renal parenchymal defect over surgicel bolsters. In 1 case renal surface hypothermia was achieved laparoscopically with ice slush. All suturing and knot tying were performed with free hand intracorporeal laparoscopic techniques exclusively. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed without open conversion. Mean surgical time was 3.0 hours (range, 0.75 to 5.8) and mean blood loss was 270.4 cc (range 40 to 1,500). Mean warm ischemia time was 23 minutes (range, 9.8 to 40). Caliceal entry in 18 cases (36%) was suture repaired in a watertight manner. Following caliceal repair, none of these 18 patients had a postoperative urine leak. Hospital stay averaged 2.2 days (range 1 to 9). Major complications occurred in 3 patients (6%) including intraoperative hemorrhage in 1, delayed hemorrhage necessitating nephrectomy in 1 and urine leak in 1. Renal cell carcinoma was confirmed on pathological examination in 34 patients (68%), and all had negative inked surgical margins for cancer. During a mean followup of 7.2 months (range 1 to 17) no patient has had local or port site recurrence or metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a viable alternative for select patients with a renal tumor. The largest single institutional experience to date is presented wherein the open techniques of nephron sparing surgery have been duplicated laparoscopically.
23
LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY: A 9-YEAR EXPERIENCE
Matthew D. Dunn, Andrew J. Portis, Arieh L. Shalhav et al. · The Journal of Urology · 2000 · 608 citations
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Initial Case Report for Benign Disease
Howard N. Winfield, James F. Donovan, ANDRE S. GODET et al. · Journal of Endourology · 1993 · 397 citations
Laparoscopic renal cryoablation in 32 patients
Inderbir S. Gill, Andrew C. Novick, Anoop Meraney et al. · Urology · 2000 · 268 citations
Medicine, Nephrology, Surgery +8
Renal Hypothermia: In Vivo and Ex Vivo
Andrew C. Novick · Urologic Clinics of North America · 1983 · 267 citations
Medicine, Nephrology, Physiology +12
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients
Inderbir S. Gill, Anoop Meraney, Dana Schweizer et al. · Cancer · 2001 · 229 citations · Full text