Adhesion of Human Osteoblasts on Root-End Filling Materials

Abstract

Adhesion of human osteoblasts to root-end filling materials (mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), IRM, composite, and amalgam) was observed by scanning electron microscopy. Root-end filling materials were inserted into 96-well flat-bottomed plates and condensed to disks of ∼1 mm thick and the same diameter as the wells. After the disks were set, they were placed in the bottom of Nunc four-well culture plates at one disk per well. Then human osteoblasts were seeded into the wells at 1.5 × 105 cells per well. After 1 day in culture the disks of root-end filling materials along with cells grown on their surface were examined with a scanning electron microscopy. Results showed that osteoblasts attached and spread on MTA and composite by forming a monolayer. Osteoblasts also attached on amalgam, but with few cells spreading. In the presence of IRM, osteoblasts appeared rounded with no spreading. These results indicate that osteoblasts have a favorable response to MTA and composite resin compared with IRM and amalgam. Adhesion of human osteoblasts to root-end filling materials (mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), IRM, composite, and amalgam) was observed by scanning electron microscopy. Root-end filling materials were inserted into 96-well flat-bottomed plates and condensed to disks of ∼1 mm thick and the same diameter as the wells. After the disks were set, they were placed in the bottom of Nunc four-well culture plates at one disk per well. Then human osteoblasts were seeded into the wells at 1.5 × 105 cells per well. After 1 day in culture the disks of root-end filling materials along with cells grown on their surface were examined with a scanning electron microscopy. Results showed that osteoblasts attached and spread on MTA and composite by forming a monolayer. Osteoblasts also attached on amalgam, but with few cells spreading. In the presence of IRM, osteoblasts appeared rounded with no spreading. These results indicate that osteoblasts have a favorable response to MTA and composite resin compared with IRM and amalgam.