Diagnosis and management of endometriosis.

Anne Mounsey, Alex Wilgus, David C. Slawson

PubMed · 2006 · 151 citations · 18 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Endometriosis presents with nonspecific symptoms, lacks an accurate noninvasive diagnostic test, and is best diagnosed by surgical visual inspection with histologic confirmation, requiring experienced surgeons to detect varied lesions. Effective pain relief for endometriosis includes oral contraceptives, medroxyprogesterone acetate, levonorgestrel IUD, and, though effective, Danazol and GnRH analogues carry significant side effects; presacral neurectomy benefits midline pelvic pain, and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo‑oophorectomy achieves pain resolution in 90 % of patients at 10 years.

Abstract

Signs and symptoms of endometriosis are nonspecific, and an acceptably accurate noninvasive diagnostic test has yet to be reported. Serum markers do not provide adequate diagnostic accuracy. The preferred method for diagnosis of endometriosis is surgical visual inspection of pelvic organs with histologic confirmation. Such diagnosis requires an experienced surgeon because the varied appearance of the disease allows less-obvious lesions to be overlooked. Empiric use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetaminophen is a reasonable symptomatic treatment, but the effectiveness of these agents has not been well-studied. Oral contraceptive pills, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and intrauterine levonorgestrel are relatively effective for pain relief. Danazol and various gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues also are effective but may have significant side effects. There is limited evidence that surgical ablation of endometriotic deposits may decrease pain and increase fertility rates in women with endometriosis. Presacral neurectomy is particularly beneficial in women with midline pelvic pain. Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy definitively treat pain from endometriosis at 10 years in 90 percent of patients.

References

18