Annals of Laboratory Medicine · 2012 · 42 citations · 10 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyDiagnostic MicrobiologyMedical MicrobiologyVirologyInfectious Disease DetectionPathogen DetectionViral DiagnosticsViral InfectionsNorovirus DetectionNorovirus InfectionRapid Detection AssaysViral Antigen Detection
Rapid and accurate detection of norovirus is essential for the prevention and control of norovirus outbreaks. This study compared the effectiveness of a new immunochromatographic assay kit (SD BIOLINE Norovirus; Standard Diagnostics, Korea) and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) for detecting norovirus in fecal specimens. Compared with real-time RT-PCR, the new assay had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 76.5% (52/68), 99.7% (342/343), 98.1% (52/53), and 95.5% (342/358), respectively. The sensitivity of the assay was 81.8% (18/22) for GII.3 and 75.7% (28/37) for GII.4. None of the 38 enteric virus-positive specimens (3 for astrovirus, 5 for enteric adenovirus, and 30 for rotavirus) tested positive in the cross-reactivity test performed by using this assay. The new immunochromatographic assay may be a useful screening tool for the rapid detection of norovirus in sporadic and outbreak cases; however, negative results may require confirmatory assays of greater sensitivity.
10
Andrew Kirby, Ricardo Queiroz Gurgel, Winifred Dove et al. · Journal of Clinical Virology · 2010 · 90 citations
José Antonio Boga, Santiago Melón, Inés Nicieza et al. · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2004 · 85 citations · Full text