OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology · 2009 · 398 citations · 16 references
The identification of ligand‑binding sites is a key step for protein function annotation and structure‑based drug design, and many computational methods have been developed. We present metaPocket, a consensus method that combines predictions from LIGSITEcs, PASS, Q‑SiteFinder, and SURFNET to improve binding‑site prediction accuracy. The four constituent methods were evaluated on two datasets comprising 48 unbound/bound structures and 210 bound structures. MetaPocket increased the top‑1 success rate from about 70 % to 75 %. MetaPocket is available at http://metapocket.eml.org.
The identification of ligand-binding sites is often the starting point for protein function annotation and structure-based drug design. Many computational methods for the prediction of ligand-binding sites have been developed in recent decades. Here we present a consensus method metaPocket, in which the predicted sites from four methods: LIGSITEcs, PASS, Q-SiteFinder, and SURFNET are combined together to improve the prediction success rate. All these methods are evaluated on two datasets of 48 unbound/bound structures and 210 bound structures. The comparison results show that metaPocket improves the success rate from ∼70 to 75% at the top 1 prediction. MetaPocket is available at http://metapocket.eml.org.
16
The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System
Warren L. DeLano · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 2002 · 18.1K citations
Analytical molecular surface calculation
Michael L. Connolly · Journal of Applied Crystallography · 1983 · 2.5K citations
CASTp: Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of proteins
T.A. Binkowski · Nucleic Acids Research · 2003 · 1.7K citations · Full text