Is Avoiding an Aversive Outcome Rewarding? Neural Substrates of Avoidance Learning in the Human Brain

Hackjin Kim, Shinsuke Shimojo, John P. O’Doherty

PLoS Biology · 2006 · 458 citations · 48 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Avoidance learning challenges reinforcement theories because successful avoidance eliminates extrinsic reinforcement, yet it may itself serve as a reward. The study tested whether avoidance of an aversive outcome engages the same neural circuitry as reward. Sixteen participants performed an instrumental choice task while undergoing fMRI, choosing between actions to win money or avoid losing money. Medial orbitofrontal cortex activity rose after both reward receipt and successful avoidance, suggesting the avoidance signal functions as an intrinsic reward that reinforces avoidance behavior.

Abstract

Avoidance learning poses a challenge for reinforcement-based theories of instrumental conditioning, because once an aversive outcome is successfully avoided an individual may no longer experience extrinsic reinforcement for their behavior. One possible account for this is to propose that avoiding an aversive outcome is in itself a reward, and thus avoidance behavior is positively reinforced on each trial when the aversive outcome is successfully avoided. In the present study we aimed to test this possibility by determining whether avoidance of an aversive outcome recruits the same neural circuitry as that elicited by a reward itself. We scanned 16 human participants with functional MRI while they performed an instrumental choice task, in which on each trial they chose from one of two actions in order to either win money or else avoid losing money. Neural activity in a region previously implicated in encoding stimulus reward value, the medial orbitofrontal cortex, was found to increase, not only following receipt of reward, but also following successful avoidance of an aversive outcome. This neural signal may itself act as an intrinsic reward, thereby serving to reinforce actions during instrumental avoidance.

References

48