Organometallics · 1998 · 33 citations · 33 references
Natural SciencesChemistryPhysicsComputational ChemistryPhysical ChemistryTheoretical ChemistryAb Initio MethodsCoordination ChemistryMetal-ligand BondingMolecular Orbital TheoryTransition Metal ChemistryTransition Metal ComplexesAb Initio CalculationsAb Initio Molecular CalculationsElectronic Structure Of Metal ComplexesIntermolecular Metal-ligand InteractionsLigand Effects On ReactivityLigand Electronic EffectsMolecular Orbital AnalysisSteric Bulk
The preference for coplanarity of alkenyl and carbonyl ligands in η 1 -alkenyl transition-metal complexes can be understood in terms of a simple molecular orbital model in which the nonbonding metal t 2g orbitals interact with the π* orbitals of these ligands. Such back-bonding interactions are most favorable when the alkenyl and carbonyl ligands are coplanar, as all three t 2g orbitals are utilized by the ligands . Optimized geometries obtained from ab initio calculations for a variety of ruthenium alkenyl complexes show the preference for alkenyl−carbonyl planarity when only one or two carbonyl ligands are present in the complex. In these complexes the energy required to rotate the alkenyl ligand is calculated to be approximately 7 kcal/mol, while in complexes with three or more carbonyl ligands this energy decreases due to competition by carbonyl ligands for favorable back-bonding interactions. This competition effectively rules out any preferential alkenyl−carbonyl arrangement, and instead steric interactions dominate. The role of the π-donor chloride ligand in stabilizing the planar alkenyl−carbonyl arrangement was also investigated.
33
Orbital Interactions in Chemistry
K. N. Houk · Organometallics · 1986 · 831 citations
Claudio Bianchini, Andrea Meli, Maurizio Peruzzini et al. · Organometallics · 1992 · 163 citations