The Role of Fixed Costs and Cost Complementarities in Determining Scope Economies and the Cost of Narrow Banking Proposals

Lawrence B. Pulley, David B. Humphrey

The Journal of Business · 1993 · 174 citations · 30 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Narrow banking proposals would separate insured deposits from most types of bank lending, and production costs could rise if deposit and loan services are not jointly produced or if joint production better spreads fixed costs. The authors use data from large U.S. banks to assess how likely narrow banking proposals are to increase production costs. Their approach estimates fixed‑cost and cost‑complementarity effects separately, unlike standard cost‑function methods. They find that the net production cost consequences of narrow banking are negligible.

Abstract

'Narrow' banking proposals would separate insured deposits from most types of bank lending. Using data from large U.S. banks, the authors examine the extent to which narrow banking proposals are likely to result in increased production costs. Production costs will rise for nonjoint provision of deposit and loan services if there are cost complementarities in producing the two outputs jointly or if joint production enables banks to spread their fixed costs more effectively. Unlike standard cost function approaches, the authors' methods allow them to estimate the fixed-cost and cost-complementarity effects separately. They find the net production cost consequences of narrow banking to be negligible. Copyright 1993 by University of Chicago Press.

References

30