Publication | Open Access
Detailed Characterization of a Nanosecond-Lived Excited State: X-ray and Theoretical Investigation of the Quintet State in Photoexcited [Fe(terpy)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>
83
Citations
63
References
2015
Year
Theoretical predictions show that depending on the populations of the Fe 3d <sub><i>xy</i></sub> , 3d <sub><i>xz</i></sub> , and 3d <sub><i>yz</i></sub> orbitals two possible quintet states can exist for the high-spin state of the photoswitchable model system [Fe(terpy)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>. The differences in the structure and molecular properties of these <sup>5</sup>B<sub>2</sub> and <sup>5</sup>E quintets are very small and pose a substantial challenge for experiments to resolve them. Yet for a better understanding of the physics of this system, which can lead to the design of novel molecules with enhanced photoswitching performance, it is vital to determine which high-spin state is reached in the transitions that follow the light excitation. The quintet state can be prepared with a short laser pulse and can be studied with cutting-edge time-resolved X-ray techniques. Here we report on the application of an extended set of X-ray spectroscopy and scattering techniques applied to investigate the quintet state of [Fe(terpy)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> 80 ps after light excitation. High-quality X-ray absorption, nonresonant emission, and resonant emission spectra as well as X-ray diffuse scattering data clearly reflect the formation of the high-spin state of the [Fe(terpy)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> molecule; moreover, extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy resolves the Fe-ligand bond-length variations with unprecedented bond-length accuracy in time-resolved experiments. With <i>ab initio</i> calculations we determine why, in contrast to most related systems, one configurational mode is insufficient for the description of the low-spin (LS)-high-spin (HS) transition. We identify the electronic structure origin of the differences between the two possible quintet modes, and finally, we unambiguously identify the formed quintet state as <sup>5</sup>E, in agreement with our theoretical expectations.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1