Publication | Closed Access
A Comparative Study of the Use of Visual Communicative Signals in Interactions Between Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Humans and Cats (Felis catus) and Humans.
326
Citations
33
References
2005
Year
Felis CatusEducationCognitionCommunicationAttentionSocial SciencesComparative PsychologyHidden FoodCognitive ScienceVeterinary Behavioral MedicineBehavioral NeuroscienceNaive OwnerComparative StudyCompanion AnimalAnimal BehaviourSocial BehaviorHuman-animal InteractionAnimal CommunicationVisual Communicative SignalsAnimal MindAnimal Behavior
The study investigated how dogs and cats communicate with humans. The authors compared dogs and cats’ responses to human pointing cues in an object-choice task with four cue variations, then tested whether subjects could indicate a hidden food’s location to a naive owner when the food was inaccessible. Both species successfully located hidden food using pointing cues with no performance difference, yet cats displayed fewer attention-getting behaviors than dogs, indicating that while familiarization with pointing gestures yields high performance, species-specific differences influence signaling toward humans.
Dogs' (Canis familiaris) and cats' (Felis catus) interspecific communicative behavior toward humans was investigated. In Experiment 1, the ability of dogs and cats to use human pointing gestures in an object-choice task was compared using 4 types of pointing cues differing in distance between the signaled object and the end of the fingertip and in visibility duration of the given signal. Using these gestures, both dogs and cats were able to find the hidden food; there was no significant difference in their performance. In Experiment 2, the hidden food was made inaccessible to the subjects to determine whether they could indicate the place of the hidden food to a naive owner. Cats lacked some components of attention-getting behavior compared with dogs. The results suggest that individual familiarization with pointing gestures ensures high-level performance in the presence of such gestures; however, species-specific differences could cause differences in signaling toward the human.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1