The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 1992 · 246 citations · 0 references
Health ProfessionsAudiologySpeech-language PathologyHearing AidsHearing SciencePsychoacousticsHearing Aid FittingHearing Aid SelectionHearing ImpairmentHearing LossSpeech Perception OutcomesSpeech RecognitionCommunication Aid EvaluationHearing Aid BenefitsHearing Aid EvaluationHearing Aid ProvisionMonaural Hearing Aid FittingPresentation Level EffectsSpeech Perception TestsSpeech Perception Under Hearing Loss
At high presentation levels, normally aided ears yield better performance for speech identification than normally unaided ears, while at low presentation levels the converse is true [S. Gatehouse, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 2103-2106 (1989)]. To explain this process further, the speech identification abilities of four subjects with bilateral symmetric sensorineural hearing impairment were investigated following provision of a single hearing aid. Results showed significant increases in the benefit from amplifying speech in the aided ear, but not in the control ear. In addition, a headphone simulation of the unaided condition for the fitted ear shows a decrease in speech identification. The benefits from providing a particular frequency spectrum do not emerge immediately, but over a time course of at least 6-12 weeks. The findings support the existence of perceptual acclimatization effects, and call into question short-term methods of hearing aid evaluation and selection by comparative speech identification tests.