Learning & Perception · 2013 · 21 citations · 31 references
Social SciencesBehavioral SciencesPsychologyIndividual DifferencesPersonality PsychologyPsychometricsMindfulnessPersonality AssessmentPersonality TraitsPsychological TestingSelf-awarenessTrait TheoryInternal Consistency ReliabilityNegative AffectivityPersonality Trait MeasurementPositive AffectivityPsychometric PropertiesPsychometric ValidityTest-retest ReliabilityTrait Mindfulness
Mindfulness is defi ned as an enhanced state of attention and awareness characterized by an open, non-judgmental pre-refl exive information processing style. Although there are different questionnaires measuring trait mindfulness, validated Hungarian versions are still lacking. One of the most widely used questionnaire for the measurement of dispositional mindfulness is the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) developed by In the present study, psychometric properties and personality correlates of the Hungarian version of the Scale (MAAS-H) were investigated on a student sample (N = 511). The scale has good internal consistency (Cronbach's alfa = 0.78), a single factor structure and a test-retest reliability of 0.71 over a two months period. MAAS showed medium level correlations (Kendall's tau_b = 0.18 and 0.19) with positive affectivity (PANAS+) and well-being (WB-5), and negative correlations (-0.22, -0.26 and -0.33) with various measures related to negative affectivity (PHQ-15, PANAS-and STAI-T, respectively). Correlation with private body consciousness (PBCS) was quite low (-0.09). Our results indicate that the psychometric qualities of the Hungarian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale are in coherence with the original scale, and thus proved to be a valid tool in order to quantify dispositional mindfulness.
31
Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Charles D. Spielberger, Richard L. Gorsuch, Robert E. Lushene · 1970 · 25.4K citations
Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness
Ruth A. Baer, Gregory T. Smith, Jaclyn Hopkins et al. · Assessment · 2006 · 7.5K citations