Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · 1996 · 11 citations · 6 references
Health ProfessionsHealth LawBioethicsEthicsMedical EthicsClinical EthicsEnd-of-life Decision MakingEnd-of-life EthicsEthical Issues In End-of-life CareEuthanasia LawHealthcare EthicsDeath With DignityEthics Of End-of-life Decision-makingEthics Of Nonbeneficial TreatmentEuthanasia RegulationHumane EuthanasiaLegal Regulation Of EuthanasiaMedical Assistance In DyingMedical Professional Organizations
Is it remarkable that the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) as a medical professional organization has the point of view that in particular circumstances euthanasia is an acceptable act for a physician. Seen from the viewpoints in the international (medical) community, we might say that it is highly remarkable. Frankly put: the RDMA has met strong international disapproval of its standpoint on euthanasia during the last 10 years or so. For instance, the World Medical Association still condemns physicians performing euthanasia as “unethical.” So far the RDMA is the only professional medical organization that holds the view that in particular cases euthanasia is morally acceptable. However, viewed within the context of Dutch society, the Dutch system of healthcare, and the sociocultural approach to moral questions in The Netherlands, the RDMA point of view ceases to be reprehensible.
6
Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life
P.J. van der Maas, Johannes J. M. van Delden, L Pijnenborg et al. · The Lancet · 1991 · 745 citations
Law, Health Law, Human Rights Law +12
Gerrit van der Wal, Robert JM Dillmann · BMJ · 1994 · 181 citations
Wibren van der Burg · Ethics · 1991 · 138 citations
P.J. van der Maas, Johannes J. M. van Delden, L Pijnenborg · PubMed · 1992 · 65 citations