The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · 2010 · 30 citations · 15 references
EducationKinesiologyPhysical EducationExercise PhysiologyHuman PerformanceMovement AnalysisAthletic PerformanceExercise InterventionsPhysical FitnessPhysical Performance AssessmentStrength TrainingWeight ManagementAthletic Performance EffectsBody Weight RegulationCompetitive AthletesMain EffectsRepeated Measures AnalysisRepeated Measures AnovaSports Performance TestingThrowing Biomechanics
The purpose of the investigation was to determine the acute effects of heavy implements on weight throw performance. Ten high-school weight throwers were recruited to participate. A within-subjects design was used to compare the difference between mean and peak distances achieved with the regulation weight after warm-up with regulation weight (control), 1.37-kg overweight (OVRWGHT1) and 2.27-kg overweight implement (OVRWGHT2). Analysis via repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed main effects for Treatment (p = 0.021) and Attempt (p = 0.015). The mean after the OVRWGHT1 treatment was the highest (14.52 +/- 3.54 m) followed by OVRWGHT2 (14.22 +/- 3.15 m) and the competition weight implement (STAND; 13.38 +/- 2.98). Paired samples t-test for peak distance by treatment revealed that both OVRWGHT1 (p = 0.004) and OVRWGHT2 (p = 0.027) were significantly different from STAND. Post hoc testing revealed that both OVRWGHT1 (p = 0.025) and OVRWGHT2 (p = 0.007) resulted in a significant difference in perceived fatigue compared with STAND. The results suggest that using overweight implements as part of the warm-up may improve performance in high-school athletes.
15