Anesthesia & Analgesia · 2006 · 24 citations · 16 references
MedicineAnesthesiologyNeuroscienceAnesthesiaElectrophysiologyGeneral AnesthesiaAnesthetic MonitoringElectroencephalogram AnalysisElectroencephalographic MonitoringElectroencephalographyEvent-related PotentialsEvoked PotentialsAnesthesia MonitoringElectroencephalogram ClassificationLinear Discriminant AnalysisStatistical Discriminant Analysis
In Brief Spontaneous or evoked electrical brain activity is increasingly used to monitor general anesthesia. Previous studies investigated the variables from spontaneous electroencephalogram (EEG), acoustic (AEP), or somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). But, by monitoring them separately, the available information from simultaneous gathering could be missed. We investigated whether the combination of simultaneous information from EEG, AEP, and SSEP shows a more discriminant power to differentiate between anesthesia states than from information derived from each measurement alone. Therefore, we assessed changes of 30 EEG, 21 SSEP, and 29 AEP variables recorded from 59 patients during four clinical states of general anesthesia: “awake,” “light anesthesia,” “surgical anesthesia,” and “deep surgical anesthesia.” The single and combined discriminant powers of EEG, AEP, and SSEP variables as predictors of these states were investigated by discriminant analysis. EEG variables showed a higher discriminant power than AEP or SSEP variables: 85%, 46%, and 32% correctly classified cases, respectively. The frequency of correctly classified cases increased to 90% and 91% with information from EEG + AEP and EEG + AEP + SSEP, respectively. Thus, future anesthesia monitoring should consider combined information simultaneously distributed on different electrophysiological measurements, rather than single variables or their combination from EEG or AEP or SSEP. IMPLICATIONS: We performed a discriminant function analysis on single and combined information extracted from simultaneous measurements of electroencephalogram, auditory evoked potentials, and somatosensory evoked potentials as predictors of four different states during clinical anesthesia. Combined information from these electrophysiological measurements showed more discriminant power than information from each measurement alone.
16
Anne Vakkuri, Arvi Yli‐Hankala, Pia Talja et al. · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2004 · 291 citations
THE AUDITORY EVOKED RESPONSE AS AN INDICATOR OF AWARENESS
Claire Thornton, Mary Barrowcliffe, Krysia Konieczko et al. · British Journal of Anaesthesia · 1989 · 146 citations · Full text