Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · 1999 · 334 citations · 25 references
Opioid EpidemicSubstance UseBehavioral Decision MakingDrug PolicyHarm ReductionDrug ConsumptionTobacco ControlAddiction MedicineHeroinReinforcement EfficacyPublic HealthStatisticsHealth Services ResearchHealth SciencesBehavioral SciencesPharmacokinetic ModelingHealth PolicySimulation ProceduresActual Consumption PatternsConsumption PatternsBehavioral EconomicsSubstance AbuseHealth EconomicsAddictionSubstance AddictionOpioid-dependent OutpatientsOpioid Use Disorder
The study discusses the relationship between behavioral‑economic and traditional measures of reinforcement efficacy. The study explores using a time‑ and cost‑efficient simulation procedure to assess reinforcement efficacy in humans. The authors used a time‑ and cost‑efficient simulation procedure in which opioid‑dependent outpatients completed questionnaires estimating cigarette and heroin purchases across varying prices. The self‑report data fit a quantitative model validated by real‑consequence studies, indicating that simulation procedures can reliably supplement traditional operant methods for assessing reinforcement efficacy, especially when operant methods are impractical or unethical.
Use of a time- and cost-efficient simulation procedure to assess reinforcement efficacy in humans was explored in the present study. Opioid-dependent outpatients completed questionnaires asking how many cigarettes or bags of heroin they would purchase across a range of prices. Reported consumption patterns conformed to a quantitative model that has been successful in accounting for data obtained in studies using real rather than hypothetical consequences, suggesting the self-report data may have been a valid proxy for observations of actual consumption patterns. Simulation procedures may thus be a useful supplement to traditional operant methods for the assessment of reinforcement efficacy in humans, particularly in situations where the use of operant methods is logistically difficult or ethically questionable. The relationship between behavioral-economic and traditional measures of reinforcement efficacy is also discussed.
25
An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement.
Michael Lamport Commons, Joanna Mazur, John A. Nevin et al. · 1987 · 1.9K citations
Behavioural Psychology, Cognitive Science, Behavioral Sciences +7
Gregory J. Madden, Nancy M. Petry, Gary J. Badger et al. · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · 1997 · 717 citations