Local consonance and the relationship between timbre and scale

TLDR

There are 4 sentences expected. Let's gather content: Background lines: 1. "[Background] The principle of local consonance is based on an explicit parametrization of Plomp and Levelt’s [J. Acoust.

Abstract

The principle of local consonance is based on an explicit parametrization of Plomp and Levelt’s [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 38, 548–560 (1965)] consonance curves. It explains the relationship between the spectrum of a sound (its timbre) and a tuning (or scale) in which the timbre will appear most consonant. This relationship is defined in terms of the local minima of a family of dissonance curves. For certain timbres with simple spectral configurations, dissonance curves can be completely characterized, and bounds are provided on the number and location of points of local consonance. Computational techniques are presented which answer two complementary questions: Given a timbre, what scale should it be played in? Given a desired scale, how can appropriate timbres be chosen? Several concrete examples are given, including finding scales for nonharmonic timbres (the natural resonances of a uniform beam, ‘‘stretched’’ and ‘‘compressed’’ timbres, FM timbres with noninteger carrier-to-modulation ratios), and finding timbres for arbitrary scales.