IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 1982 · 29 citations · 13 references
MedicineBiomedical EngineeringRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyDigital ImagingContrast MediaMedical Image AnalysisMedical ImagingVascular ImagingContrast Media In AngiographyContrast-enhanced AngiographyFilteringImage Processing In AngiographyIodinated Contrast AgentsIodinated Contrast MediaRecursive Digital FilteringRecursive Filtering
Both digital subtraction and recursive filtering schemes have been employed successfully for intravenous and intraarterial arteriography. Either processing method results in an image(s), S, which is a linear combination of discrete images Ij acquired during the flow of iodinated contrast material, i.e., S = Sum of k(j)l(j) from j = 0 to N where k(j) are the weighting coefficients for the N+1 samples. It is shown that for a given set of images {l(j)} there exists a set of weighting coefficients {k(j)} which maximizes the iodine signal to noise ratio and simultaneously removes stationary background anatomy. The k(j) are related to the contrast dilution curve measured over an artery of interest, k(j) = s[j]-Mean(s), where {s[j]} is the set of measured image variations due to the flow of contrast material, and Mean(s), is the mean value of the s[j]. This choice of k(j) defines a matched filter. Compared to subtraction angiography, matched filtering is 4-6 times more dose efficient.
13
Digital subtraction angiography of the human cardiovascular system
T. F. Meaney, MA Weinstein, Edward Buonocore et al. · American Journal of Roentgenology · 1980 · 170 citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Radiology +16
Intravenous angiography using digital video subtraction: x-ray imaging system
TW Ovitt, PC Christenson, HD Fisher et al. · American Journal of Roentgenology · 1980 · 105 citations
Digital K-Edge Subtraction Radiography
R. A. Kruger, Charles A. Mistretta, Andrew B. Crummy et al. · Radiology · 1977 · 65 citations
Veterinary Medicine, Radiology, Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging +14