Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism? Beyond Westphilian towards a post-racist critical IR

TLDR

Critical IR theory has been examined for twenty‑five years, yet it may implicitly reinforce Western superiority and naturalise imperialism, though it still offers valuable insights. The article seeks to expose Eurocentrism in critical IR and reconstruct it toward non‑Eurocentric directions, thereby preventing it from becoming a problem‑solving theory and proposing a post‑racist emancipatory project for East‑West reconciliation. The authors deconstruct Gramscianism, postmodernism, and feminism to reveal their Eurocentric lapses, then decolonise Westphilian critical IR by steering it into fresh non‑Eurocentric frameworks. The study concludes with a post‑racist emancipatory political project aimed at initiating global reconciliation between East and West.

Abstract

ABSTRACT In appraising critical IR theory after twenty-five years, this article begins by asking whether critical theory implicitly reinforces the ‘superiority’ of Western civilisation and naturalises Western imperialism. In revealing the Eurocentrism of much of critical IR theory the article proceeds to reconstruct it by steering it in fresh non-Eurocentric directions. This is not to say that extant critical theory is moribund since it undoubtedly has much to offer. But it is to say that until the problem of Eurocentrism is exorcised from its body theoretique, critical theory inadvertently lies in danger of joining the ranks of problem-solving theories. The first two sections deconstruct the leading schools of critical IR theory – Gramscianism, postmodernism and feminism – to reveal their frequent lapsing into Eurocentrism, while the final section seeks to decolonise ‘Westphilian’ critical IR’. And this in turn leads on to the conclusion, which sketches out a post-racist emancipatory political project that can help begin the urgent task of effecting global reconciliation between East and West.