International human rights: a regime analysis

Jack Donnelly

International Organization · 1986 · 345 citations · 38 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Since 1945, international action on human rights has expanded markedly, driven by growing moral interdependence, national commitment, ideological appeal, and shifting power distributions. The study examines the utility of regime analysis for non‑economic issue areas and evaluates the nature, extent, and evolution of international cooperation on human rights across eight regimes. The authors first develop a typology of international regimes, then analyze eight international and regional human rights regimes using this framework. The analysis indicates that while future growth in human rights action is limited, regime analysis remains a useful, albeit heuristic, tool for understanding international cooperation in increasingly issue‑specific international relations.

Abstract

After laying out a typology of international regimes, eight international and regional human rights regimes are analyzed in order to (1) examine the utility of regime analysis in noneconomic issue-areas, and (2) assess the nature, extent, and evolution of international cooperation on human rights. There has been a remarkable growth of international action since 1945, when human rights were not even widely accepted as a legitimate issue-area. This growth can be explained largely by expanding perceptions of moral interdependence and community, increased national commitment, the growing ideological appeal of human rights, and changes in the distributions of international power. These same factors, however, suggest only limited future growth. On a broader theoretical plane, the case of human rights suggests a significant, if limited and principally heuristic, utility for regime analysis, especially to the extent that international relations is becoming increasingly concerned with specific issues.

References

38