Publication | Closed Access
The Repair of Tracheal Defects Using Bioabsorbable Mesh
11
Citations
0
References
1992
Year
Tissue EngineeringTracheobronchitisCervical TracheaEngineeringSoft Tissue SurgeryVeterinary SurgeryReconstructive SurgeryThoracic SurgerySurgeryWound HealingBiomedical EngineeringPolypropylene MeshPp MeshSoft Tissue ReconstructionMedicinePlastic Surgery
This study compares the use of synthetic bioabsorbable mesh with that of non-absorbable mesh in repairing tracheal defects. Two patch windows, each 1 cm x 1 cm, were created on the ventral wall of the cervical trachea in 12 adult mongrel dogs. One window was repaired using a bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) mesh graft, and the other using a nonabsorbable Marlex mesh (polypropylene mesh; PP mesh) (C. R. Bard, Inc., Billerica, MA) graft. The dogs were killed at intervals from 1 to 35 weeks after surgery. Macroscopically, there was no difference between the two mesh groups until 3 weeks after surgery. At 6 weeks in the PP mesh group, the connective tissue over the mesh was remarkably thick, and after 9 weeks, constriction by scarlike tissue was evident, as compared with the PGA mesh group, which showed no constriction. Microscopically, epithelium covered the whole mesh in both groups at 6 weeks. However, in the PP mesh group, flat and poorly differentiated cells occupied a large area, and after 9 weeks the height of the epithelial cells in the PP mesh group was less than in the PGA mesh group. Furthermore, in the PP mesh group, nonciliated cells occupied a large area even at 15 weeks, and the submucous connective tissue layer was thicker than in the PGA mesh group after 6 weeks. The results indicate that, from the point of view of wound-healing, bioabsorbable mesh may be more adequate for repairing tracheal defects.