De Economist · 2008 · 204 citations · 48 references
Social SciencesEconomicsEconometricsLabor EconomicsLabor Market AnalysisEmploymentHousehold EconomicsLaborLabor Market DynamicsWage DeterminationWorking HoursCross-country ComparabilityLabor Demand EstimationLabor Market Demand EstimationLabor Supply ElasticityLabor Supply ModelingLabour Supply ElasticityWomen's Labor Force ParticipationWomen’s Labor Force Participation
The study conducts a meta‑analysis of empirical estimates of uncompensated labour supply elasticities. It aggregates and compares published elasticity estimates across countries and estimation methods. The analysis finds that in the Netherlands the elasticity is about 0.5 for women and 0.1 for men, men’s elasticity is relatively stable across countries while women’s varies, and that estimates are sensitive to the hours‑function specification and estimation method, implying that rising female participation may lower elasticity in the future.
This paper performs a meta-analysis of empirical estimates of uncompensated labour supply elasticities. For the Netherlands, we find that an elasticity of 0.5 for women and 0.1 for men is a good reflection of what the literature reveals. The elasticity for men hardly differs between countries, but for women some cross-country variation is found. The increasing participation rate of women may lead to a somewhat lower elasticity in the future. Both the specification of the hours function and the estimation method are found to affect elasticity estimates.
48
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
James J. Heckman · Econometrica · 1979 · 28.9K citations
American Economic Review · 2013 · 15.2K citations
Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System
James J. Heckman · Econometrica · 1978 · 1.9K citations
Mark R. Killingsworth, James J. Heckman · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 1987 · 755 citations