Defying Unjust Authority: An Exploratory Study

Piero Bocchiaro, Philip G. Zimbardo

Current Psychology · 2010 · 41 citations · 27 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study investigates psychological factors that foster disobedience to unjust authority, using behavioural observations, individual difference assessments, and post‑experimental interviews to understand predictive cognitive and affective processes. The experiment employed a modified Utrecht obedience paradigm in which participants were instructed to deliver 15 escalating hostile comments to a confederate upon failing a trial, with teacher proximity and remote authority conditions designed to increase disobedience. Only 30 % of participants complied with the insulting commands, while the majority refused at some point during the escalating hostility sequence.

Abstract

This research explores the psychological factors potentially involved in fostering disobedience to an unjust authority. Our paradigm was modeled after that of the Utrecht Studies on Obedience (Meeus and Raaijmakers European Journal of Social Psychology 16:311-324, 1986) in which participants are ordered to give each of 15 increasingly hostile comments to a participant/victim whenever he fails a trial. Although 30% of our sample followed commands to insult the other participant (confederate), the majority did refuse to do so at some point in the escalating hostility sequence. Our procedure utilized conditions known from prior research to increase the ratio of disobedience to obedience: proximity of teacher to learner plus remote authority. In order to better understand some of the cognitive and affective processes that may predict such defiant behaviour, we utilized a variety of measures, among them, behavioural observations, individual difference assessments, and in depth post-experimental interviews.

References

27