Publication | Closed Access
Interaction of holes in a Hubbard antiferromagnet and high-temperature superconductivity
491
Citations
14
References
1988
Year
Superconducting MaterialEngineeringBismuth-based SuperconductorsNovel SuperconductorsMean Field TheorySuperconductivityQuantum MaterialsHigh Tc SuperconductorsSuperconducting DevicesMaterials ScienceQuantum ScienceHigh-tc SuperconductivityPhysicsCondensed Matter TheoryQuantum MagnetismComparative EnergyHigh-temperature SuperconductivityNatural SciencesCondensed Matter PhysicsApplied PhysicsQuantum SuperconductivityString Potential
High‑temperature superconductors’ CuO₂ planes are modeled by a two‑dimensional Hubbard model. The authors study an infinite Hubbard lattice slightly doped below half filling, exactly diagonalizing the Hamiltonian in a truncated Hilbert space and computing one‑ and two‑hole energies versus wavevector to analyze angular‑momentum channels and magnetic polaron effects. A single hole remains delocalized with a large effective mass, whereas a pair of holes becomes extremely heavy due to frustration, raising their energy so they do not bind, contradicting mean‑field predictions.
The ${\mathrm{CuO}}_{2}$ planes in the high-temperature superconductors are described by a two-dimensional Hubbard model. The model is investigated for an infinite system with one and two electrons less than half filling. The method used is to diagonalize the Hamiltonian exactly within a retained portion of the Hilbert space. A single hole is found not to be localized by a string potential that increases linearly with distance, although it does have a large effective mass. A pair of holes, which naively should be quite mobile, is found instead to be extremely heavy due to a previously unappreciated frustration effect that impedes their motion. This lack of mobility increases the energy of the pair so that they do not bind, contrary to some recently published results using mean field theory or intuitive arguments. The energy of one- and two-hole states is calculated as a function of wavevector k. The comparative energy of different angular momentum channels and magnetic polaron effects are discussed.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1