Automatic summarisation of legal documents

Claire Grover, Ben Hachey, Ian Hughson, Chris Korycinski

2003 · 54 citations · 13 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The SUM project applies automatic summarisation techniques to the legal domain. The study aims to apply automatic summarisation techniques to legal documents through the SUM project. We classify sentences by rhetorical role to extract summary‑worthy types, employing state‑of‑the‑art NLP with XML tools and rule‑based and statistical methods, and evaluate tense and aspect features for a classifier on a small House of Lords sample. Our experiments on House of Lords judgments show that linguistic annotation reveals relationships between linguistic features and argumentative roles.

Abstract

We report on the SUM project which applies automatic summarisation techniques to the legal domain. We describe our methodology whereby sentences from the text are classified according to their rhetorical role in order that particular types of sentence can be extracted to form a summary. We describe some experiments with judgments of the House of Lords: we have performed automatic linguistic annotation of a small sample set and then hand-annotated the sentences in the set in order to explore the relationship between linguistic features and argumentative roles. We use state-of-the-art NLP techniques to perform the linguistic annotation using XML-based tools and a combination of rule-based and statistical methods. We focus here on the predictive capacity of tense and aspect features for a classifier.

References

13